Could an Oil Slick Trip Up Stock Investors in 2006?
By James Flanagan,
Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A.
mike[at]gannglobal.com
http://www.gannglobal.com/
Advertisements:
After
generally rallying for the last 2 or 3 months, stocks suddenly ran into
an unexpected roadblock. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) had climbed
to within about 6% of its all-time high and other indexes, while not as
close to peak historical levels, had risen in tandem. Then some disquieting
news from the Middle East rocked the markets and threatened to send energy
prices spiraling out of control, hammering stocks sharply lower.
Such
was the situation in October 1973, at the beginning of the Arab oil embargo.
The price of crude would quadruple over the next several months, plunging
world economies into deep recession. The Dow got slammed for a 20% loss
by early December, and Wall Street didn't bottom until about a year later.
By
Friday, January 20 of this year, stock investors wondered if history was
about to repeat. Amid strong global oil demand and already tight capacity,
Iran, the second-biggest producer in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC), broke U.N. seals on its nuclear facility at Nanantz
on January 10 and resumed research the rest of the world fears could lead
to development of an atomic bomb. The financial community braced itself
for possible sanctions or even a military confrontation that could result
in an Iranian embargo or otherwise disrupt crude supplies. Meanwhile,
rebels in fellow OPEC nation Nigeria attacked drilling platforms, blew
up a pipeline and kidnapped oil workers, knocking out some 10% of the
output from the fourth-largest supplier to the U.S. It didn't help that
Osama bin Laden crawled out of the woodwork (or out of his cave) and threatened
new terrorist acts against America in an audiotape aired Thursday, January
19.
Crude
oil prices, which burst from the gate to start 2006 with a vigorous one-day
jump of $2.10 when Russia rekindled concerns about the use of energy as
a political weapon by temporarily halting discounted exports of natural
gas to now pro-western Ukraine, continued their resurgence. The expiring
February contract surged $1.52 to close at $68.35 per barrel on January
20. March crude likewise shrugged off official reports of a surprising
2.7 million barrel rise to multiyear inventory highs to end the week at
$68.48, within easy striking distance of the all-time cash price high
of $69.81 and nearest-futures record of $70.85, both established in the
immediate wake of Hurricane Katrina, which ravaged the oil-producing Gulf
Coast and submerged much of New Orleans at the end of last August. The
DJIA plummeted more than 213 points, or 1.96%, on heavy volume likely
magnified by the expiration of January stock options, its biggest single-day
slide since May 2003. The decline wiped out what was left of the blue-chip
average's gain for 2006. Broader measures, although also sharply lower,
remained slightly in the black on the year.
An
insatiable appetite for affordable energy, and the ability of industry
to deliver it through improvements in technology and distribution, has
fueled the engine of economic growth since the days of the Industrial
Revolution. Coal became the first fossil fuel to emerge as the nation's
primary energy source when it displaced firewood in 1885, and at the end
of World War I still accounted for 75% of total U.S. energy use. In the
late 19th century, America remained mired in the so-called
"Long Depression," marked by deflation and protracted bear markets in
stocks from 1872-1877 and 1881-1896. Business picked up, however, when
the use of electricity, essentially unavailable before the 1880s, exploded
by a factor of 600 between 1896 and 1912 as utility companies slashed
production costs per kilowatt-hour from 12 cents to 2 cents.
Petroleum
was relatively slow to catch on as a fuel in the decades following August
1859, when "Colonel" Edwin Drake, a railroad conductor on sick leave,
struck oil with a 70-foot homemade drilling rig in Northwest Pennsylvania
before he could receive an order from his backers to quit. Auto production,
in units, finally surpassed wagons and buggies for the first time in 1913.
The U.S. population of draft animals, such as horses and mules, didn't
peak until about 1920. Car sales tripled during the Roaring Twenties,
and only the Great Depression could interrupt the boom in consumption
of crude.
After
World War II, railroads lost business to trucks and began switching to
diesel locomotives themselves. Simultaneously, labor problems and safety
requirements pushed up coal production costs. By 1947, petroleum consumption
exceeded coal. U.S. refiners never paid more than about $3 a barrel for
oil. To protect domestic producers, President Eisenhower instituted import
quotas in 1959 under the Mandatory Oil Import Program (MOIP), resulting
in a stable U.S. price around $3 that persisted until 1970. Even at the
paltry $3 level, American consumers effectively subsidized the oil companies
by paying significantly more than the rest of the world. The price of
Arabian light crude, as posted at Ras Tanura, a city in eastern Saudi
Arabia, stayed at $1.80 per barrel in the 10 years following the formation
of OPEC in September 1960.
Dirt-cheap
energy prices ushered in an unprecedented "Golden Era of Economic Growth"
in Western Europe that saw a 5% average annual expansion in real Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) in the west, including the U.S., and near-10% growth
in Japan from 1950 to 1973. Increasingly prosperous Americans fell in
love with a wide assortment of electric appliances and gas-guzzling vehicles.
After supplanting coal as the nation's main fuel source, oil consumption
quadrupled in a generation. Never has an energy source achieved such rapid
dominance. By comparison, it took 38 years for overall domestic energy
consumption to quadruple in the 1880-1918 period. Between 1930 and 1970,
the real (inflation-adjusted) price of gasoline dropped by over 70%. From
1940 to 1970, the real cost of electricity per kilowatt-hour fell more
than 75%. Per capita electricity consumption rocketed by 8 times during
the 1940-73 interval. Predictably, given the glut of power, nobody cared
much about energy efficiency. A doubling of GDP, which required a 150%
increase in electricity usage before the end of the war, suddenly necessitated
a fivefold escalation.
Americans
had power to burn, so they did. But burgeoning domestic demand outstripped
production, forcing the U.S., which had remained largely self-sufficient
in energy through most of the 1950s, to import enlarging quantities of
crude oil. By 1976, foreign oil accounted for fully half the nation's
usage. Making matters worse, aggregate U.S. petroleum production topped
in 1970 and then began to tumble, as correctly forecast by Dr. M. King
Hubbert, a geophysicist who created a mathematical model to predict maximum
output ("Hubbert's Peak"), which is eventually supposed to lead to a steep
decline once depletion ensues. Needless to say, Hubbert's theories have
drawn renewed interest in an environment of record-high oil prices.
All
of this left the U.S and other oil-importing countries extremely vulnerable
in 1973 when indignant Arab oil exporters retaliated against the west
for backing Israel after Syria and Egypt attacked it in the Yom Kippur
War. The era of robust economic growth quickly gave way to a decade of
stagflation and stratospheric interest rates, punctuated by the 2 worst
postwar recessions to date and a stock market that couldn't get out of
its own way. Surprisingly, neither the original embargo nor a second "energy
crisis" sparked by the Iranian Revolution in 1979 and subsequent outbreak
of the Iran-Iraq War in 1980, nor any other worrisome geopolitical events
since have prompted the U.S. to particularly lessen its dependence on
foreign crude. Between 1985 and 2000, imports more than doubled. Starting
in 1994, U.S. imports exceeded domestic petroleum production and total
net imports hit a record 52% of consumption in 2000.
Most
Wall Street analysts noted abundance in storage and supplies before projecting
subdued oil prices averaging about $55-$60 in 2006, on the heels of last
year's greater-than-40% leap to $61.04 a barrel at the end of 2005. Can
the stock market and economy survive prices at current levels or higher?
Of
course, they may not need to. The rampant bullish trend in crude dates
back to at least November 15, 2001, when oil stood at $17.48 a barrel,
placing it in a very mature position for a cyclical bull market in any
commodity. Oil's frenzied move up when Hurricane Katrina struck looked
climactic but, though prices sagged, they hung on stubbornly. The present
strength in commodities as a whole appears powerful enough to possibly
overwhelm any factors that might otherwise dampen the advance. Metals
prices are going through the roof and the Continuous Commodity Index (the
old CRB Index) recently made fresh all-time highs, although its breakout
remains unconfirmed by the energy-heavy Goldman Sachs Commodity Index,
which still languishes beneath its post-Katrina highs.
Even
if crude manages to prolong its uptrend, it need not spell the end for
stocks. The entire bull market since October 2002 unfolded even as oil
prices spiked more than 100% higher. The economy remained remarkably unfazed
by last summer's destructive hurricanes and tumult in the energy markets. Emerging
economies are supposedly more sensitive to oil shocks because they use
far more energy per unit of GDP than their counterparts in the developed
world, but the change in year-over-year GDP currently averages 5.5% for
25 of the top emerging markets in the face of crude prices well above
$60.
In
the U.S., the oil crises motivated Americans to become more energy-efficient.
Energy outlays decreased as a proportion of household expenditures
from a peak of 9.3% at the height of the 1980 crisis to a more manageable
6.3% at its most onerous level post-Katrina. The energy consumption needed to produce a constant dollar's worth
of GDP got cut virtually in half between 1949 and 2000, although the rate
of decline moderated somewhat after crude prices fell off the table in
1986. Vehicular fuel consumption also decreased markedly after the embargo,
until fuel economy began to level off in the 1990s. And while Americans
can't seem to kick the foreign oil habit, at least the share of U.S. net
imports from OPEC nations slipped to less than 44% in 2004 compared to
a whopping 72% in 1977.
High
prices so far haven't killed America's taste for black gold. U.S. consumption
recently crossed 22 million barrels per day to set a new record. Historically,
rising crude prices only launch bear markets and recessions when they
go up enough to drive down consumption. A short-lived slowdown in demand
appeared to materialize last autumn when gasoline pump prices vaulted
past $3 a gallon, but it usually takes something quite drastic and stunning
to inflict lasting harm. The 300% embargo-related price spike in a span
of roughly 5 months in 1973-74 certainly qualifies, and its lingering
effect suppressed consumption into 1975. Demand recovered by 1978, but
slumped to a post-embargo low in 1983 on Middle Eastern turmoil and recessions
stateside. A furious 164% price jump in less than 4 months caused by Saddam
Hussein's invasion of Kuwait in August 1990 led to a slight dip in oil
imports and a brief recession.
A
study of every major bull market top in stocks dating back to the Civil
War reveals that important highs in bond prices (lows in interest rates)
preceded each big-time downturn in the stock market except for a handful
of occasions, in which the turn lower in bonds slightly lagged or occurred
coincident to stocks. Commencing with the 1973 Arab oil embargo, crude
prices and long-term interest rates tracked one another with uncanny correlation
for over 2 decades. It's not all that surprising when you consider that
prices for money and the planet's most critical commodity each respond
to similar economic forces like growth rates and inflation. A temporary
feint higher by interest rates in 1983-84 marked the lone instance when
a change in one market's direction didn't pull the other along within
a reasonable time frame. Long rates ratcheted up from below 7% to above
8-1/2% in 1974. After a few years of relatively flat prices, crude went
nuts in 1979-80. Bonds embarked on a secular bull market after long rates
skyrocketed well into the teens in 1981. In the meantime, oil prices stayed
weak for 18 years. Both interest rates and crude collapsed in late 1985-early
1986. Bonds topped less than 2-1/2 weeks later than crude's bottom in
the spring of 1986. Interest rates then sprinted higher with oil until
July 1987 and bond investors got no relief for another 3 months, when
Wall Street's precipitous Black Monday bloodbath induced a flight to safety
and caused central banks around the world to flood financial markets with
liquidity. Ten-year Treasury yields topped out in May 1990 and challenged
their highs again in August following the Kuwaiti invasion. Oil peaked
just weeks later on the same day that stocks descended to their final
bear market low. On October 5, 1998, bonds established an important high.
Though hard to believe, crude started its historic ascent soon thereafter,
from a low of a mere $10.80 a barrel in the week before Christmas of 1998.
Stocks would reach highs not seen ever since in the first quarter of 2000.
Bonds
haven't reacted at all to crude's latest bounce. Interesest rates on 30-year
Treasuries hit rock bottom at 4.135% in June of 2003 before retesting
that level 2 years later. They're still hanging around within hailing
distance, less than 50 basis points (hundredths of a per cent) higher.
It would be all but unheard of for a bull market in stocks to endure for
over 2-1/2 years following a bond-price peak, assuming 2003 marked a concluding
bond top. Lead times in the past have typically approached 2 years at
most.
Before
high oil prices can terminate the bull market in stocks, they'll probably
have to put a meaningful dent in the bond market or impact consumer demand
for energy, which seems unlikely given that heating oil is lagging crude
noticeably and natural gas prices just skidded to a 7-1/2-month low on
unseasonably mild winter temperatures. Friday's sharp stock sell-off engendered
a fair amount of pessimism among option buyers, and the S&P just barely
clipped its important August 2005 high on the first trading day of this
year, before reversing sharply higher, which should bode well for stocks
going forward.
About
the author:
James Flanagan
is a well known specialist in the field of financial market forecasting
and analysis. Using a proprietary, complete database of price history
and the methods of W.D. Gann, he has been publishing his forecasts and
investment research since 1990 (Past Present Futures newsletter). James
oversees all of the research for the Financial, Stock, and Commodity Markets
at Gann Global Financial. You can visit his website: http://www.gannglobal.com
Published - February 2006
|