Overcoming The Objections That Keep You From Achieving Massive Success
By Kurt
Mortensen,
the CEO of the Persuasion Institute in Orem,
a professor of public speaking and persuasion,
S. Orem UT, U.S.A.
askkurt[at]persuasioninstitute.com
www.PreWealth.com
Advertisements:
Realize that most objections can be resolved before they
even arise. Cost is often the first objection that is put up, but usually
it’s not the true reason, deep down, for rejecting a product or service.
Nothing de-energizes your persuasive efforts more than lingering doubts
and concerns that remain unresolved in your prospect’s mind. No matter
what you’re selling, all objections can fit into one or more of the
following categories. Read on...
No matter what you’re selling, all objections can fit
into one or more of the following categories:
1. Fear of failure — "Can I do this? Will this really work?"
2. Lack of support — spouse, parents or friends unsupportive.
3. Can’t make the commitment — don’t have time, conflicts with existing obligations, childcare concerns, etc.
4. Not enough motivation — the discomfort of the prospect’s
current situation is not great enough that s/he wants to make
changes.
5. Financial concerns — fear that the prospect can’t afford
it or will be extremely stretched trying to. Is it worth the investment?
Notice that I listed financial concerns last. Cost is often
the first objection that is put up, but usually it’s
not the true reason, deep down, for rejecting a product or
service. I’ll explain more about this topic later. With
an idea of where objections stem from, let’s talk about
when the optimal time is to handle them. As I already mentioned,
the ideal scenario is for all your prospect’s questions
and concerns to be answered as a natural course of your exchange - not
after you’ve gone through your entire presentation.
Nothing de-energizes your persuasive efforts more than lingering
doubts and concerns that remain unresolved in your prospect’s
mind. When you are "interviewing" your prospects, use your
open-ended questions to help them open up and shed light on
any possible areas of concern. With this approach, you are
opening the door to bring up and cover such issues on your
terms. This persuasive strategy is not a matter of manipulation;
by virtue of the roles you each play - you as the one offering
a solution and the prospect as the one seeking a solution - it
is more practical and effective for both parties to get what
they want.
There are two challenges at play when, after you’ve
gone through your presentation, a prospect still voices concerns.
First of all, you did not discover enough information to accurately
anticipate and diffuse concerns while they were still seeds
in your prospect’s mind rather than rooted plants. Secondly,
if the prospect has to bring it up and begins questioning
you, merely by nature of the dialogue, you are now on the
defensive. This flipping of roles will never place you in
a strong persuasive position. Worse, if you do project even
a hint of defensiveness or insecurity toward your prospect
or product, that in and of itself can breed more doubt in
the prospect’s mind than perhaps the original concern
did. How awful to lose a sale based on mistaken perceptions!
And yet, these details make or break sales all the time.
Let’s talk about price for a moment. It seems to be
everyone’s top concern, doesn’t it? Independent
researchers found that 68 percent of prospects admitted that
price was not the determining factor, but they also admitted
that they knew by experience that stating that the price is
too high is the best way to get rid of a salesperson. Price,
in fact, is seldom the sole reason for buying or not buying
something. When asked the reasons why they did buy something,
94 percent of interviewed customers mentioned non-price issues
as being the most important factor for their purchase.
If you think about it, it doesn’t make sense to buy
something just because the price is good. What if it’s
not something desirable, useful or necessary? Would you buy
it just because of its price? When you do a good job of helping
people see how your product will improve their lives, change
their lives or move them from their current situation to their
desired situation, price is usually the least of their concerns.
It all goes back to the emotions - the pain of their current
situation sharply contrasts with what they want and hope for
in the future and is thus the true motivator. At that point,
you could name almost any price and they would buy. I say
this not to suggest in any way that you should take advantage
of that psychological tendency but simply to underscore that
price is not the issue.
Now, let’s look at the worst-case scenario: Even after
the best presentation you could muster, your prospect still
has issues. If you ever find yourself in this situation, there
are a number of considerations to bear in mind. First and
foremost, ask yourself if this is a conflict you can even
resolve. Suppose you find out the real reason why your prospect
is hung up on the price is that s/he just declared bankruptcy.
In that case, obviously, no matter what you do or say, you
have no control over the situation. If it is an issue that
is solvable, however, then let your prospect talk. Just hearing
her/him out will diminish her/his need to contend over price.
Conversely, if you become upset, impatient or condescending,
you will just make your prospect cling to the price issue.
Always remain calm and empathetic in the face of resistance.
This behavioral strategy will come across as more professional,
credible and trustworthy. A calm and caring demeanor also
gives your prospect room to save face if s/he changes her/his
mind. Never back your prospects into a corner. It’s
a good idea to start out at square one and review with your
resistant prospects the many different ways in which your
product meets their needs.
Help your prospects step back again and see how your product
will move them from their current situation to their ideal
situation. If, in the end, they remain adamant, never close
the door. Extend to them the opportunity and invitation to
come talk to you again should they ever change their mind
or have further questions. And lastly, don’t beat yourself
up. There are those people who are just going to resist, even
if you said and did everything perfectly. This rejection is
usually based on their own past experiences and perceptions,
so don’t take it personally.
How do we handle those common put-offs like "I need to think
this over," "I need to sleep on it," "I have to talk to my
wife first"? If your prospects are insistent, respect their
wishes, but be sure you’re following up again within
twenty-four hours-forty-eight hours at the absolute most.
If you let too much time lapse between your initial encounter
and your follow-up, you communicate to your prospects that
it’s not important. Then they feel like they’re
off the hook. If you’re not the one calling them, it
is very likely you’ll never hear from your prospects
again.
A key thing you have to remember when following up is that
the emotion of the original dialogue has dissipated. You must
bring it back in order to close the deal. This is why sales
that aren’t closed at the first meeting are harder to
close down the road. It’s somewhat of an irony, but
the shorter the sales time, the better. The longer a prospect
has to "think about it," the less likely it is that you’ll
have a deal. So remember that, when following up by phone,
you’re going to have to exert that persuasive energy
all over again to recapture your prospect’s excitement
and enthusiasm. Moreover, you will no longer have the advantage
of being able to do so in person. Also, you have less time
to do so since your conversation by phone will generally be
shorter.
One effective way to minimize the likelihood of sending someone
home who still hasn’t made a decision is to make a very
clear "qualifying statement" right up front. A qualifying
statement occurs when you define at the outset exactly how
you are going to spend your time together. Additionally, you
define what your expectations are for each other and what
you hope to get out of the meeting. In essence, you are "qualifying"
your time together and how it will be spent. An example of
a qualifying statement would be: "Mrs. Smith, what I’d
like for us to do today is find out exactly what you’re
looking for, get all of your questions answered and see if
this is a good fit. If we both feel good about it, we’ll
get the ball rolling for you. If it’s not a good fit,
we’ll be up front about that, too, and maybe I can make
some other recommendations for you."
Qualification is an excellent approach because it disarms
your prospects. You’ve told them exactly what to expect,
so they can relax. They won’t be caught off guard when
you begin asking lots of questions because they’ll understand
why you’re asking them. Also, using the word "we" is
often helpful instead of "I" and "you" so that your prospects
feel like you’re collaborating together.
By using the "we" voice, you will come across as more of an
advisor than someone who is trying to sell your prospects
something. Most importantly of all, this approach is designed
to give you an answer, one way or the other, in that very
same meeting. In other words, there won’t be any loose
ends remaining when you and your prospect walk away from each
other. Here is another example of a qualifying statement:
"Let’s make an agreement, Mr. Jones. I’m not a
high-pressure consultant, so you don’t have to worry about me trying to get you involved with anything you don’t
want. All I want to do today is show you how to increase your
income in your business and how it will work for you. Please
do me a favor and let me know today if this is a good fit.
Fair enough?" From this point, walls of resistance have been
removed and you are well on your way to closing the deal.
About the Author: Kurt Mortensen’s trademark is Magnetic
Persuasion; you should attract customers, like a magnet. Claim your success
and learn what the ultra-prosperous know by going to www.PreWealth.com
and get my free report "10 Mistakes that Cost You Thousands."
Source: www.isnare.com
Published - September 2007
|