Interview with a RICS Property Surveyor (UK)
By Property Investor
Hub Blog
http://www.propertyinvestorhub.co.uk/
Advertisements:
Please see an interview with Charles Dixon – a RICS surveyor with
over 26 years of experience in the industry. Charles provides some
insightful information of much relevance to UK property investors
including a definition of what `value' means today; modern day valuation
techniques; due diligence tips; his own thoughts on the property
market; regulation of the property industry and much more…
1) Can you explain a bit about your background?
I have worked in the property world since graduating from
Reading University in 1976 initially in the South Midlands
and East Anglia, but for the last 26 years in the South West
including Cornwall, Devon, Somerset and Dorset.
2) What is your definition of `value' in the current UK
property market?
Here is the non technical answer: the UK property market is
a largely open and free market made up of thousands of
individual transactions made by people and organisations
with wide-ranging objectives. A free flow of information in
the market is essential in informing the decisions behind
those transactions. The internet has revolutionised the
availability of information on transactions and has made it
accessible to everyone; whereas before only people in the
industry had such information. This has enabled many more
people to join the property owning community. Value is what
one person will pay to another for a property and, if value
is not to be distorted, both parties must be well informed
and acting in an arms length (ie. not personal)
relationship.
3) Would it be fair to say that most surveyors are taking
a conservative view on the valuation of property due to the uncertainty
of the market?
Surveyors base their assessment of value not only on
comparable evidence of similar transactions but also on
their assessment of current market sentiment from the
general public, the volume of properties available and being
traded and of course many external factors that bear on the
individuals undertaking a property transaction – for
example: the general state of the economy, interest rates ,
taxation policies etc. If surveyors are taking a
conservative view, this should reflect a conservative
approach that parties are taking in actual negotiations and
transactions and reflecting the uncertainty of the market of
which they form part.
4) The majority of investors reading this are residential
property buyers – one difficulty that has emerged as a result of
the low market activity is the ability to obtain comparable sold
data. What can be undertaken from your point of view to assist with
this issue?
Data on property transactions is available through many free
websites and through the Land Registry. Statistics on trends
are also available free from the Department for Communities
and Local Government and indices on house price movements
from Halifax Bank and Nationwide Building Society. There are
also subscription websites giving additional data which
further knowledge about local markets (such as `Hometrack').
Agents are generally willing to help with information on
transactions in their area provided they are approached
tactfully and they are not restricted from giving
information on a transaction by confidentiality. The current
situation is dramatically better for individual investors
than it has ever been and over time it is likely to improve
further with the further development of the internet.
However when there are so few transactions as we are
currently experiencing, it is difficult find comparable
evidence. This is a difficulty for professional Valuers as
much as the general public. It needs deals to be done to
establish the market. In these conditions investors may be
taking greater risks as their decisions are less well
informed. Property transactions have never been risk free
and it may be that, after a long period of a rising market
before this recession, some people became too complacent and
assumed that their property transactions could not fail.
5) Can you talk through the processes that you would undertake
prior to visiting a property in terms of your own due diligence?
Terms of business must be agreed with the client before
visiting the property. Very often the client is pressing to
have the advice/ survey/valuation as quickly as possible so
that office based research sometimes happens after a visit
rather than before. In any case, the Surveyor can target his
research more efficiently if he has first visited the
property and actually it and its location. Depending on the
purpose of the report, the Surveyor will want to consider
most of the following:
- planning consents;
- short, medium and long term planning issues in the area;
- recent works of repair / improvement to the property;
- available consents guarantees;
- boundaries and related responsibilities;
- location and routes of utilities;
- environmental issues;
- contamination issues;
- presence of mines;
- flood risks;
- subsidence risks;
- details of construction if it is non-standard;
Much of this information and more is available through a
local Authority search and website enquiries from various
organisations.
6) Similarly, if you are requested to undertake a `desktop'
valuation what steps would you take?
Surveyors should be very wary of desktop valuations which
can be misleading to the recipient if the basis of the
valuation is not properly understood. In general, such
valuations should only be undertaken when the property has
been previously inspected and preferably not too long
before. Such valuations must clearly state the assumptions
on which they are made. They are best avoided when a
surveyor is dealing with the general public who will
probably expect the same level of knowledge of the property
as if it had actually been inspected and may feel let down
if they subsequently find changed conditions which had not
been identified through the lack of an inspection.
7) On the back of the last two questions, do you think
residential house prices in the UK are still over-valued?
In my opinion, residential house prices are too high in
relation to salary levels – particularly if as a society we
wish to encourage a home ownership culture. This is not a
fault of the property market, but of external factors that
bear on home buyers such as a lack of new homes available to
buy thus restricting supply. In an open market such as the
property market in the UK, home buyers are competing for the
available homes to buy with other types of purchasers such as
foreign investors, buy to let investors, holiday home buyers
etc. Unless the government intervenes to disadvantage these
other types of purchasers (which I would not advocate) the
key to reducing prices is to increase the supply of homes on
the market.
8) Should residential property investors take more of
a `value' based approach – as is what is more common in commercial
property?
If the motive for purchase is property investment then yes,
a value based approach is the best advice. However, when
people buy for their own occupation and use they apply many
different subjective criteria and will sometimes ignore the
rational behaviour of the market and pay in excess of what
the property could be resold for. This is a valid part of a
diverse open market that sometimes makes it unpredictable
for those observing it from a distance.
9) You are a major advocate of regulation of the property
industry – and your book discusses this in detail – what kinds of
measures do you think should be in place?
I am an advocate of the proper regulation of individuals
working within the property industry particularly to protect
the inexperienced general public who occasionally
participate. I do not particularly advocate regulation of
property itself unless there is a clear need. In many parts
of the property industry there is a clear need and obvious
benefit from various types of regulation, however in general
I feel that there has been excessive and too complex
regulation in recent years to the extent that some people
ignore areas of regulation or the regulation restricts the
market. Regulation should be proportionate to the benefit
achieved as well as being simple and straightforward.
10) Is there a difference, in your opinion, between regulation
to install professional principles into the industry and the government
just sticking their oar in?
Governments are motivated to regulate where they feel that
consumers are adversely affected or if the market is acting
imperfectly or against policy objectives. Governments are
also motivated to find ways to tax property which is a good
store of private wealth and an easy target for the raising
of public finance. Sometimes Governments will regulate in
pursuit of social policy objectives. In general, the
government in the UK has not regulated much in pursuit of
encouraging professional principles, but rather has relied
on the industry self-regulating itself through its
professional bodies such as the RICS and NAEA. The
Government has resisted the temptation to statutorily
regulate Estate Agents which it could have done at any time
by using powers in the Estate Agents Act of 1979. This
means that the professional bodies need to be constantly
looking at themselves critically to ensure that they are
reflecting public opinion and public concerns by adapting
their regulatory arrangements to keep up with best practice.
About the Author:
For more interviews like this and to keep up-to-date with the
latest news, hints, tips, strategies and more please see the
'Property Investor Hub Blog':
http://www.propertyinvestorhub.co.uk/
Published - August 2010
|